Wednesday, 11 December 2013

"Constitutional Deficiency and the Current Political Crisis in Bangladesh"




Problems of Election Commission and Election time Care-taker Government System mainly derived from recent changes in our constitution. Though the changes are recent these sorts of problems are in no sense new for the people of Bangladesh. They have suffered from same sorts of political discords and confrontation in last 20years. Those problems or discords were dispatched with momentary solutions than looking for a long term solution of this problem every time they arose. As a result they kept popping out every now and then.

The main problem here is- how we change our constitution. We saw BNP (Bangladesh Nationalist Party) was changing constitution during their tenure without any participation of another major political party, AL (Awami League). As a result, what we have noticed, AL once they are in power started changing those part of the constitution that were created or amended without their voices being heard. However, this went further; AL did not just stop in amending those parts of the constitution they again went on to change the way we hold our general election in this country. I would not go no asking about ALs intention in doing so neither I am going to assume their intention from these acts. But I would like to analyse the current political deadlock.

As AL formed the government with more than two third of the seats in the parliament they can almost do whatever they want to do in the parliament legally but not necessarily legitimately. Now, we know parliament is the place where all the bills are debated and eventually passed by the members of the parliament (MPs). Most of the bills are passed in the parliament only with two-third majority and when the ruling government have more than two-thirds of all the seats in the parliament they can legislate virtually anything. There is no way of stopping them unless their own party members vote against the bill. Unfortunately it is very unlikely to happen when a member of a political party is going to contradict party mandate or the bill that has been presented in front of the parliament to pass as laws, because a member of a political party is barred from voting against the party mandate. If anyone wishes to do so he could immediately lose his membership from the party. Due to this, once a bill is introduced by the government that bill is scarcely denied approval in the parliament even when the other members of the parliament voted against it. MPs from other parties have right to vote but their votes may eventually go in vain. As a result we have seen most of the MPs from other political parties except AL abstained themselves from joining the debate sessions in the parliament. They knew their opinion will be insignificant and, if needed, will be overridden by the ruling AL government. Thus we have noticed how incompetent the parliament had been throughout the last five years. Two third majority of AL in the parliament has galvanised its effectiveness. When it should be playing a role of checks and balance of the government law making rather it became a means of institutionalizing the wishes of the government by passing laws without any debate.

The same things happen when it comes to amending the constitution. Our constitution simply requires two-third majority votes from all the members of the parliament to be amended (Article 142(a)(ii)); and AL took this opportunity to implement their desired changes in the constitution. They have altered the way we hold elections in this country. They have abolished the impartial or non-party election time care-taker government system. The main opposition party BNP did not have enough voice in amending and a result we have been witnessing a strong demand for a care-taker government whereas the ruling AL have kept on rejecting their demand.

As the day of the vote-casting is getting closer the demand from BNP is also getting stronger. Consequently, we have seen strikes, shut-downs and spar of violent clashes, where many innocent civilians have lost their lives and many more have been injured. The miseries of those who have been injured without any fault from their part, of the family members of those who have lost their lives and above all of the people of this country have no bounds. I have even lost words to describe these sufferings of people. I could not help asking what their mistake that justify them suffering this way? They did not have any direct voice in amending the alleged part of the constitution neither they directly approved that. The only fault that I could think of from their part is that they have elected a party to form a government and that government eventually went on to change the constitution.

To be precise, the fault is subtle than this. Practically, they have allowed a party to form government with more than two-third majority in the parliament. In a sense, the civilians have given ruling AL indefeasible power to make laws and amend constitution. As a result, it appears the grieved political party BNP is making the civilians pay for their deed (voting AL). The question we should ask- whether their faults (if there is any at all) are so grave that would justify making them pay this way?

While you are thinking about that, you should also be thinking about the more important question of how we can prevent similar types of situation from arising in future. I would like to put forward some of my opinions regarding that process of avoiding. Firstly if we can build another major political party, not like the current political parties who go on forming coalition to secure their existence, which might be able to ensure that no political party will be able to form a government with two-third majority in the parliament. This will be an indirect check against reoccurring similar political deadlock because it can reasonably be expected that three major political parties will be fighting heart and soul to get mere majority against each other to be able to form a government. However, without any doubt, it will not be possible for a political party to become a major one over night. It will take at least a decade or more for a political party to be in the same political ground as AL and BNP. And the path will not be easy going when there is no good democratic practice as the current major parties might try their best to resist up-rise of another competitor.

Another possible solution can be further amendment of the constitution. But this time it will be for good reasons. We have to add a mechanism so that no political party can change our constitution without following a specific procedure that will ensure voice of all political parties and so do people of Bangladesh.

Third way of resisting this from happening- would be adding a way of referendum in the constitution so that when any political party or government wants to change or amend constitution they would have to seek permission from people of the country before they can pass that through the parliament. Referendum has long existence in many democratic countries and it would not necessarily involve another general election. It could simply the civil society members and constitutional experts who hold good knowledge of benefits and consequences from the changes about to bring.

Last two mechanisms are depended on the whim of political parties as they would involve amending the constitution and no-one but the political party in power or government can only change the constitution. But for the sake of the people of Bangladesh, political parties should do this so that they themselves don’t become victims of each other’s political whims. AL should have learned from the tenure of BNP’s previous tenure when they changed the constitution without their attendance and should have incorporated a mechanism in the constitution to prevent that happening again. Sadly for the people of Bangladesh who have elected them, they haven’t done so and instead they followed the same path as BNP did which turned politics into violence. AL should have realized if they lose the battle in the upcoming general election there is no guarantee that changes will not be turned over and against their interest. From their approach it appears if the changes are made in the constitution by another government after general election they will also take the path of violence and bloodshed to undo the changes as BNP has adopted at this moment. Nothing will happen to them only the innocents to die!

No comments:

Post a Comment